Lösungscode: Reihe 1 von links nach rechts
am 6. Februar 2026, 14:48 Uhr von PinkNickels
Fun one! Fortunately, i was correct on my initial thought on flow. otherwise could have gotten tricky!
am 5. Februar 2026, 16:53 Uhr von Mr Toffee
Added the rule bit... flow must be determined!
am 5. Februar 2026, 15:46 Uhr von tjmas
In the solution code, there is a place where the thermo decreases from bulb to tip, no? I do not believe it is solvable without this, either. Am I missing something?
Spoiler (if im wrong):
Row 5 column 6 / row 5 column 7
------
Hiya, I missed "flows must be determined" from the ruleset, perhaps mistakenly...
spoiler alert
-- r5c1 can't 'hit' r7c5, so direction is up northwesterly r5c7 - r3c4 --- the 2/3 in r6c8 then limits r7c4 thermo, so r5c5 + r5c7 both 'feed' the 'flow' r5c6 - r7c5 thermo tip...
Flow or flüsse, which I think means rivers, is the get out clause... flow must be determined... In jeder Situation muss der Fluss gefunden werden. I have just now put it back in the rules.
There used to be valves to direct flows because I thought the thermo rule was absolute in every direction, and that this kind of thing broke the puzzles due to that, but that direction uncertainty, the mercurial flower, has become a fog of sorts, so that it doesn't give up its secrets immediately all at once... which is nice for a ruletype commonly known for having everything given away all at once.
am 4. Februar 2026, 19:36 Uhr von Titan29
Pretty new to the whole merging and diverging thermos thing, at least when the merging and diverging is this ambiguous. I figured it out though, nice little puzzle!
am 4. Februar 2026, 17:51 Uhr von Mr Toffee
Ooo, well spotted, I have amended the puzzle design to solve without ambiguity.
| Schwierigkeit: | ![]() |
| Bewertung: | 89 % |
| Gelöst: | 40 mal |
| Beobachtet: | 2 mal |
| ID: | 000RB1 |