No Negative Knight
(Eingestellt am 22. März 2024, 18:16 Uhr von GBPack)
1) Es gelten die normalen Sudoku-Regeln
2) Zellen, die durch einen Springerzug getrennt sind (im Schach), dürfen nicht dieselbe Ziffer enthalten
3) Durch einen schwarzen Punkt getrennte Zellen enthalten Ziffern im Verhältnis 1:2. Nicht alle Zellenpaare im Verhältnis 1:2 haben einen schwarzen Punkt dazwischen
Du kannst es hier spielen: f-puzzles. Oder hier: CTC-App
Lösungscode: Reihe 1 + Reihe 2 (18 Stellen)
Kommentare
am 29. Juli 2024, 09:42 Uhr von Gullie
Wow, I enjoyed that a lot! Can’t believe iets only at 77%. The middle part was quite tricky, the comments helped me figure out the ending :-).
Very clever setting, loved how that final piece fell in the puzzle. Thanks for sharing!
am 10. April 2024, 19:43 Uhr von Isfan
Love the puzzle and the clever use of Rule#3!
Thank you ♥
@VitP
A "Negative Constraint" means that all marked clues are given, such as Black Dots. It doesn't apply to the Anti-Knight rule since it's not a marked clue.
A "Negative Constraint" rule here would be along the lines of "All black dots are given." Most puzzles with no negative constraint say "Not all black dots are necessarily given."
This puzzle's wording is similar to the latter, but with an important key difference..
am 26. März 2024, 09:23 Uhr von VitP
several people have mentioned a "negative constraint" in these comments. what "negative constraint"? "anti-knight" is NOT a "negative constraint"
am 24. März 2024, 15:38 Uhr von BHUNTER47
FYI - the solution code that Sudokupad thinks is correct, as far as I can tell, is the incorrect solution that you would get without very careful reading of Bullet 3.
The solution code that works here as the valid solution is showing up as invalid in Sudokupad
am 23. März 2024, 20:21 Uhr von Ryx
Nice use of the negative constraint. Unfortunately for me, I am self diagnosed "boolean-challenged", so at the end, I got the wrong solution .. until I re-read the instructions 3 more times ;-)
am 23. März 2024, 06:20 Uhr von Juiceshack
This may be my favorite puzzle I've ever solved. I've never seen a negative constraint need to be implemented in order to give the unique solution so hats off to you, Well Done!
am 22. März 2024, 22:42 Uhr von SKORP17
ich habs begriffen !
am 22. März 2024, 21:00 Uhr von Unterstadt96
That is a mean positive use of negative constraint.
am 22. März 2024, 19:39 Uhr von Playmaker6174
What an evil ending haha
I think a lot of people here will miss that extra detail on the rule set x)
