Lösungscode: All digits within Schrödinger cells, lowest digit first, top-row to bottom-row.
am 23. September 2023, 12:06 Uhr von zrbakhtiar
hi. can you clarify on cage cell r5c9. is it consider part of darker red cage? because when i open CTC link with highlights, there is a cage for r5c9. but CTC without highlights, the cage is missing.
---
@zrbakhtiar - I see you resolved the issue already; thank you for your solve! Just in case anyone else sees this, the cage in R5C9 is strictly ornamental, so it is removed along with the highlighting for some of the puzzle links -- VKP
---
Haha. I just realised once you place S-cell candidates for box 3, one should know that there cannot be another cell to be included for darker red cage apart from the C-shape. Thank you for clarification.
am 23. September 2023, 02:50 Uhr von tehbertl
Wew, that was a hard one. Like marcmees said, the break-in wasn't too hard, but the placement/interactions for the Schrödinger's cells in the middle three columns/boxes (and some of the sudoku related to that) was quite hard to break through.
Part of that (in my case) was definitely some leaps of logic, though! Once I got back to an earlier point and saw the ultimate solution path I may or may not have smacked my forehead, haha.
am 22. September 2023, 15:45 Uhr von ViKingPrime
Updated difficulty (based on comments below).
---
A clear example of the subjective nature of ratings. This puzzle felt particularly smooth to me when setting but that's likely due to some familiarity with how the constraints play together with Schrödingers; your mileage may vary (but please don't let that steer you away! It's to my mind the best of the series).
am 22. September 2023, 12:51 Uhr von SirWoezel
I Agree with Marcmees. I even gave this 5 stars for difficulty.
am 22. September 2023, 09:41 Uhr von A very large bear
I find it rather unfortunate to see this puzzle have so few verified solves after a couple days. Overall I think the constraints lead to some very pretty logic, and found it to be a delightful solve.
Maybe the concepts just resonated well with me but this felt like a 2 or 2.5/5 difficulty for me. Overall smooth solve where I didn't have nearly as many "what am I even supposed to do?" type moments I've experienced in other 3*+ puzzles. Would very much recommend anyone stumbling across the comments section to give it a try.
am 22. September 2023, 09:12 Uhr von marcmees
the entry to the puzzle is easily found, as well as the position of the first 6 schrodinger cells. After that it's a long search to combine the possibilities of the remaining ones. The proposed 3* are misleading. Very nice but hard (imo).