Logic Masters Deutschland e.V.

Calvary

(Eingestellt am 3. Mai 2023, 08:30 Uhr von Fool on Hill)

Puzzle rules

Normal Sudoku rules apply.

On a green line adjacent digits must differ by at least 5 (standard German whisper)

If two digits are separated by a black dot, one must be twice the other (partial Kropki - not all dots are necessarily given)

The digits in a cage may not repeat and must sum to the total given in the top left corner.

Here is the Cracking the Cryptic link: Calvary

Here it is on F-Puzzles: Calvary

Lösungscode: Row 1

Zuletzt geändert am 3. Mai 2023, 15:20 Uhr

Gelöst von by81996672, timyoth, SXH, Count Knersis, wilsig, pepe74287, LehanLehan, MacZidane, ArnulfKoch, benisjammin, flipping, Matti64, T1geR, WatermeRen, cbjenkins, apendleton, VeTaurus, zorant, pepu273, ... rhodri, radium, Johannes Quack, Wenni, Felis_Timon, ChampionAsh5357, k2u5as, lpq29743, koiking, augsod, noodlehead, snuuba, Gota, Fenn, forsen, MrWhite2020, xtmacxattack, kisha, Jowser
Komplette Liste

Kommentare

am 29. Dezember 2023, 22:25 Uhr von tretro
Wow, what an aventure ride. Consistently challenging until the very end. Thanks a lot

am 8. September 2023, 23:07 Uhr von cascadeshiker
Thanks. A perfect level of difficulty for me. I resolved the Kropki dots and the whisper polarity fairly quickly, but then struggled to actually complete the puzzle.

Zuletzt geändert am 25. Juli 2023, 10:18 Uhr

am 25. Juli 2023, 10:18 Uhr von phs
Great composition!! And enjoyable solve, difficult enough but not too much. Thanks.

Zuletzt geändert am 15. Mai 2023, 23:13 Uhr

am 15. Mai 2023, 19:28 Uhr von Orpheus
Neat puzzle, I really enjoyed the play between the lines.

Thank you!

Zuletzt geändert am 8. Mai 2023, 19:29 Uhr

am 8. Mai 2023, 13:43 Uhr von tutuism
uwu

Thank you. Glad you enjoyed.

Zuletzt geändert am 8. Mai 2023, 08:57 Uhr

am 8. Mai 2023, 01:24 Uhr von 99%Sneaky
Fun puzzle, I enjoyed coming back to where I started near the end of the solve.

Thanks for the comment. Glad you enjoyed it.

Zuletzt geändert am 6. Mai 2023, 16:58 Uhr

am 6. Mai 2023, 16:39 Uhr von Hydalin
For people who are used to these constraints it is quite easy, but I guess 2* is fine :)
For me it was 23 minutes during lunch :D

Thank you for giving it a go. I am getting a bit better at setting easier puzzles, but not at rating them ...

Zuletzt geändert am 6. Mai 2023, 07:09 Uhr

am 6. Mai 2023, 01:24 Uhr von MarthaB
Fun puzzle.

Thanks. Glad you enjoyed it.

Zuletzt geändert am 5. Mai 2023, 07:16 Uhr

am 5. Mai 2023, 00:21 Uhr von Onkel_Dagobert
I find it funny that people apparently can‘t agree what the difficulty of this puzzle is. Usually, the puzzles on this site are a bit harder for me than for most, but I found this one really easy.

Thank you for the comment. I think some people are not quite expecting the relationship between cells which emerges, and others see it straight away as a natural deduction.

Zuletzt geändert am 4. Mai 2023, 21:50 Uhr

am 4. Mai 2023, 21:32 Uhr von peep50183
I enjoyed this greatly; it started out easy but then the subtle steps started to appear :) I found this about a 2-2.5*.

Thanks so much for the comment. I will perhaps persist in setting controversial intermediate puzzles ...

Zuletzt geändert am 3. Mai 2023, 22:41 Uhr

am 3. Mai 2023, 22:35 Uhr von HumanBirdsong
Lovely construction!

Thank you! Glad you enjoyed it.

Zuletzt geändert am 3. Mai 2023, 21:44 Uhr

am 3. Mai 2023, 21:35 Uhr von Tingo
Very enjoyable solve. Thanks for setting and sharing!

Glad you enjoyed it. Thanks for the comment.

Zuletzt geändert am 3. Mai 2023, 17:38 Uhr

am 3. Mai 2023, 17:29 Uhr von Montikulum
Fun riddle - from my point of view 3/5 difficulty.

Thank you - glad you enjoyed it. As you can see there has been a variety of comment on difficulty - I put it at 3/35 to start with, but quite a number of people were finding it easier. Thanks for giving voice to the minority!

Zuletzt geändert am 3. Mai 2023, 14:37 Uhr

am 3. Mai 2023, 14:35 Uhr von PinkNickels
Would rate this about 1.8 stars. Nice setting, solid puzzle.

Thank you. I had hoped it would be on the easier side. I very easily underestimate the difficulty of my puzzles.
I'm glad you liked it.

am 3. Mai 2023, 11:42 Uhr von WatermeRen
I think 2 star is definitely more appropriate than the 3 it was when I started, considering I'm usually not able the do 3 stars within an hour

am 3. Mai 2023, 11:06 Uhr von Fool on Hill
Change to 2*/5

Zuletzt geändert am 3. Mai 2023, 11:05 Uhr

am 3. Mai 2023, 10:56 Uhr von ArnulfKoch
Very nice, but a little bit too easy (between 1 Star and 2 Star)

Thank you - I thought easier, but at least one good solver who tested it found one step hard to see. I will put it down to 2*

Schwierigkeit:2
Bewertung:91 %
Gelöst:267 mal
Beobachtet:16 mal
ID:000DSC

Variantenkombination

Lösung abgeben

Lösungscode:

Anmelden