Lösungscode: Row 4, Row 7
am 3. März 2024, 15:14 Uhr von wullemuus
Another jewel because of the unusual ruleset and the unexpected interactions between all the moving parts. Fortunately, I found the breakin very fast. The colouring of the regions took a lifetime (therefore I appreciate another coaching ;)). After that the digits could be placed like on a string of pearls- really wonderful!
---------------
Nice job on the break-in! For me coloring took place up until the very end, but as the positions of all the 9's and 1's can be found early along with a decent portion of road that provide region borders, most of the 9's and 1's can be color-paired and the 2x2 rule helps a lot. But yeah it's hard. There are reasons this puzzle has the fewest solves of all my puzzles :)
Thanks again for yet another solve of one of my puzzles!
am 1. Januar 2024, 12:03 Uhr von Lavender Gooms
Lovely. It's quite a daunting ruleset, but incredibly satisfying.
------------------
Wow I didn't think I'd ever get any more solves for this beast. Thanks for solving and glad you found it enjoyable!
am 24. Januar 2023, 19:54 Uhr von bodemeister
@henry yes the loop can occupy a 2x2 shape.
am 24. Januar 2023, 18:39 Uhr von henrypijames
You still haven't asnwered if the loop is allowed to occupied a 2×2 like R3C1-R1C1-R2C1-R2C2, which the example doesn't do. The rules only say that a region cannot occupy 2×2.
am 24. Januar 2023, 18:33 Uhr von bodemeister
Edited the rules for clarity.
am 24. Januar 2023, 18:09 Uhr von bodemeister
@henry, no cell can be part of the road twice, as that would make multiple loops in the grid. The sum of the digits adding to 10 doesn't count the cities, but the road segment not turning more than once does include the cities, meaning that from one city to a neighboring city, there are only two possible roads: one traveling vertically and then horizontally, and the other horizontally and then vertically. I will update the rules to make these points more clear. Thank you for your questions and interest in the puzzle!
am 24. Januar 2023, 17:01 Uhr von henrypijames
Is the loop allowed to touch and/or cross itself? The one in the example doesn't, but the rules don't mention this.
am 24. Januar 2023, 16:15 Uhr von henrypijames
I also (still) don't understand the meaning of "including the cities at the endpoints". How could the rules be interpreted differently if this phrase were left out?
EDIT: I think I understand it now: It rules out R3C3 and R6C6 from being connected via R3C3-R3C2-R7C2-R7C6-R6C6.
am 24. Januar 2023, 00:18 Uhr von bodemeister
@kjholt, thanks for your question and checking out my puzzle! It means if two neighboring cities are at R2C2 and R4C5, the road segment connecting them must be horizontal on row 2 and then vertical on column 5, or it must be vertical on column 2 and then horizontal on row 4. Any other route would require the road segment to have at least two corners. For any two neighboring cities, there are only two ways to draw a road connecting them.
am 23. Januar 2023, 21:26 Uhr von dennischen
I think it means "changes direction once" (alternatively, "turns exactly once"). That would probably be clearer verbiage, assuming I am correct.
am 23. Januar 2023, 21:17 Uhr von kjholt
I'm not following this part of rule 2: "each road segment connecting neighboring cities (including the cities at the endpoints) has only one corner." What does "including the cities at the endpoints" mean?