Logic Masters Deutschland e.V.

Kropki squared sudoku #1

(Eingestellt am 20. September 2020, 07:45 Uhr von Nylimb)

This is a variant of a kropki sudoku, in which each dot gives information about 4 adjacent cells, not 2.

Standard sudoku rules apply: Fill the grid with numbers from 1 to 9, so that every row, column, and 3x3 box contains each of the 9 numbers exactly once.

For each group of 4 cells that forms a 2x2 square, a black dot in the middle means that the numbers can be divided into 2 pairs (A,B) and (C,D) with A/B=2 and C/D=2. A white dot means that they can be divided so that A‑B=1 and C‑D=1. A grey dot means that they can be divided so that A‑B=1 and C/D=2.

In case 2 different dots could be used, the darkest possible dot will be shown. For example, the numbers 1, 2, 3, and 6 would have a black dot, since 2/1=2 and 6/3=2, not a grey dot (2‑1=1 and 6/3=2). The numbers 3, 4, 5, and 6 would have a grey dot, since 5‑4=1 and 6/3=2, not a white dot (4‑3=1 and 6‑5=1).

Digits can be repeated within a 2x2 square if they're not in the same row, column, or box.

All possible dots are given.

The puzzle is available on Penpa.

Lösungscode: Row 9 and column 9.

Zuletzt geändert am 21. Oktober 2020, 01:57 Uhr

Gelöst von Jesper, dm_litv, Qodec, NikolaZ, Mody, henter, SudokuExplorer, cdwg2000, Gliperal, Vebby, fritzdis, ndsurgenor
Komplette Liste

Kommentare

am 11. November 2022, 15:59 Uhr von ndsurgenor
Glad to have finally got this one an official rating!

am 21. Oktober 2020, 01:57 Uhr von Nylimb
Added Penpa link.

am 5. Oktober 2020, 16:42 Uhr von cdwg2000
@Nylimb
Thank you for your reply. I think I haven’t found a more suitable logical path to solve the problem. I will continue to try the second problem later.

am 5. Oktober 2020, 12:49 Uhr von Nylimb
@cdwg2000: Generally speaking, when I'm creating a puzzle I begin with some constraints that allow the solver to get started, and then gradually add more constraints to continue the solution path. In the beginning there are many different choices of constraints that work, but after a while the choices get restricted, and it's more a matter of finding constraints that work rather than designing them. At that point I often use a computer to find all solutions and show the constraints that lead to unique solutions. I then try those by hand to see if they have nice logical paths to the solution. Many of them don't, so I reject them. But some of the rejects may have a constraint that leads to some nice logic, even if it's not enough to fully solve the puzzle without bifurcation. So I add that and run the program again. If I'm lucky, I eventually come up with a puzzle that I enjoy solving.

In this case, I started by looking at 3x3 boxes with 4 dots in them, and came up with the arrangement in box 4 of the puzzle. Then I experimented with adding more dots, picking ones that allowed me to fill in more digits. That led to the arrangement in columns 1 to 3. I think I added another dot or two before running my sudoku solving program for the first time, and when it ran it found millions of solutions and listed the resulting dot patterns. Most patterns gave multiple solutions, so I rejected those. I tried solving some of the remaining ones by hand, starting with ones that had a small number of dots; I think 10 dots was the minimum that I tried. I couldn't see how to solve those without bifurcation, but some of them had additional dots that yielded some nice logic. I ran the program again with those dots added, and again tested some of the results by hand. I found a few that had nice logical solution paths, and decided that this was the best one.

am 5. Oktober 2020, 09:54 Uhr von cdwg2000
I am very curious: the logical problem-solving path of the problem itself is very narrow. How did you consider the problem when you set it out, or that there is a particularly hidden problem-solving logic? Thank you!

am 3. Oktober 2020, 06:33 Uhr von Nylimb
Clarified rules, added '#1' to name.

Zuletzt geändert am 28. September 2020, 01:08 Uhr

am 27. September 2020, 20:07 Uhr von Aishasei
Can numbers within a 2x2 square repeat?

@Aishasei: Yes, they could repeat if the square crosses a box boundary.

am 25. September 2020, 18:23 Uhr von SudokuExplorer
Wonderful! I really enjoyed the logic :-)

am 21. September 2020, 17:16 Uhr von Mody
hat mir gut gefallen

Schwierigkeit:5
Bewertung:93 %
Gelöst:12 mal
Beobachtet:9 mal
ID:0004CY

Arithmetikrätsel

Lösung abgeben

Lösungscode:

Anmelden