Solution code: Column 1.
on 20. February 2025, 00:15 by dzamie
Oh! I didn't notice we were given the total balancing weight. It's completely unnecessary, but probably nice to have anyway.
This was a lot of fun to figure out. You really don't need to do too many calculations if you're clever about it, too.
on 18. February 2025, 13:04 by Bobson
I'm really impressed you got the math on this to work out. I was expecting more math than it ended up being - I feel like some of your others (like Math Test) needed more of it to solve - but I appreciated it being called out since it isn't obvious that it would be necessary (unlike in that one).
on 16. February 2025, 16:04 by geronimo92
Beautiful construction but certainly not 3 stars, probably 1.5
on 14. February 2025, 12:28 by pms_headache
Loved it! But if you were doing a significant amount of math at the end, you were doing too much! I did no multiplication and forgot that you told us the total weight. Thanks for a fun puzzle.
@pms_headache You should have had a deadly pattern, of about 8 cells at the end, that required the balancing, with addition and multiplication of all columns. If not, you found something I didn't, or maybe you fell into the correct solution, by mistake. Thanks for playing. Peace to you. -Will Power
Please note: The German version of this page has changed. It is possible that this page does not contain the latest information.