The solution does not require hard strategies. Have a nice solution! I will be very glad to see your comments.
Solution code: row 8
on 19. August 2024, 21:50 by permafrostyx
yay
on 2. July 2024, 17:36 by wacfwaef
Very fun and easy puzzle, hopefully it becomes a GAS
Reply:
Thank you for the nice words!
on 21. June 2024, 07:42 by kross
I didn't even realize there was a negative constraint until after I solved it and read the comments. So I don't think it's needed at all. The puzzle solved quite easily without the negative constraint.
on 14. June 2024, 19:43 by fractalminding
User bpcobra96 pointed out a bug. One green dot was missing. The picture and link to the solution have been changed.
on 13. June 2024, 22:09 by fractalminding
Yes. You're all right about the negative constraint. At first, the solution was planned differently. But for some reason I had to change the sudoku. Therefore, there are 1 or 2 points with a negative constraint that you can use, but you don't have to. Thank you for the kind words. I am very pleased.
on 13. June 2024, 22:02 by NotThatItMatters
The negative constraint entered very rarely. Straightforward solve with nice payoff in Renbans.
on 13. June 2024, 20:13 by PinkNickels
Like user wuc, I also did not use the negative constraint. The author is correct, it does not require any fancy strategies to solve. I would rate this a tougher 1* or lower 2*. If a lesser experienced solver is concerned this will be too difficult, please don't! You can solve this and it's quite pleasant.
on 13. June 2024, 19:28 by wuc
The fibonacci restriction forces a lot of direct digits. I didnt use the negative constraint. Fun approachable puzzle thx.