Solution code: Row 1
on 22. September 2022, 16:26 by PrimeWeasel
3 star break-in I'd say, the rest is more like 2, felt quite nice to solve though.
PV: Thank you very much :)
on 22. September 2022, 16:22 by Garford
Took myself way to long to solve... I guess it's not m best day today. :D
The puzzle combined with your dedication to your family would make up for about 200% rating. That's not an option, unfortunately. So I stick to a "very nice".
PV: Thank you very much :)
on 21. September 2022, 23:17 by marcmees
congrats to the family.
PV: Thank you very much :)
on 21. September 2022, 18:43 by Raumplaner
Many congrats to you and your family. I hope Emma-Sophie will enjoy this puzzle one day as much as I did.
PV: Thank you very much :) I will definitely indoctrinate her with puzzles :D
on 21. September 2022, 17:59 by Phistomefel
First of all, congratulations to you and your family. The puzzle is nice and I think it is easier than 4 stars. I liked the idea of disambiguating everything with the diamonds. Thank you for the puzzle, Peter! :)
PV: Thank you very much :)
I got different feedback on difficulty, it is always hard to put. But let the solvers decide on what the real difficulty is :)
on 21. September 2022, 17:00 by MonsieurTRISTE
Very nice puzzle! Once you find the picky neighbor, you can solve it smoothly.
PV: Thank you very much :)
on 21. September 2022, 15:51 by tenaliraman
Fun stuff!
And Belated Congratulations!
PV: Thank you very much :)
on 21. September 2022, 12:56 by OutOfMyMindBRB
Brilliant, almost magical :-)
It's a tough puzzle, be fourwarned!
PV: Thank you very much :)
on 21. September 2022, 12:12 by Volkner
This puzzle definitely seems to be broken. A clue or something is missing?
PV: Hi Volkner, maybe my rules weren't clear enough, but I can assure you there is definitely a solution to this puzzle :) (there is also a video on it on YT, search for Zetamath stream #18)
Volkner: Yes, thank you. Completely missed it. Got to chalk this one up as a loss.
PV vs Volkner: 1 - 0 :)
PV: It is not a competition between setter and solver ;) I would rather have lost this and that you would have found the solution :)