Logic Masters Deutschland e.V.

Kings and/or Knights

(Published on 5. August 2022, 03:08 by Scruffamudda)

Normal sudoku rules apply.

In this puzzle every digit conforms to an anti-king and/or anti-knight constraint.
Identical digits share the same constraint/s and consecutive digits (eg 1 and 2) must share at least one constraint.

Digits separated by a black dot are in a ratio of 1:2.
All possible dots showing a 1:2 ratio are given.

CTC app link

f-puzzles link

Solution code: row 9


Solved by derKrampus, bansalsaab, Azumagao, Dentones, Isa, Tilberg, Bjd, apendleton, Jagga, Myxo, jguer, ohammersmith, avahales, tinounou, jwsinclair, AvonD, akial, Pibonacci, laregioncentrale, ViKingPrime, ... karen_birgitta, DVFrank, cegie, PippoForte, schlathubali, lovely, chain.reader, soroush, amelia0, Cocoanut, Racteal, Bankey, timyoth, Mikemerin, Abbott Abbott, h5663454, jadezki, ClarityC, annnz
Full list

Comments

on 28. April 2023, 15:21 by Bankey
Very involved logic and needs high focus throughout. Fun to solve. Thanks, @ Scruffamudda :)

on 7. August 2022, 11:59 by DVFrank
Very nice! :^) And thanks @derKrampus for the clarification

on 6. August 2022, 23:21 by Christounet
Very nice ! That was a refreshing ruleset in the domain of the anti-knight anti-king puzzles which usually lead to the same type of scanning in the late solve. Thanks.

on 6. August 2022, 21:15 by zhall12570
Beautiful!

on 6. August 2022, 02:36 by derKrampus
That is not what it means, @DVFrank. A digit satisfies *at least* 1 constraint, but it can satisfy both of them as well. so for example if 1 satisfies constraint A, then 2 can either satisfy only A or both A and B. And if 1 satisfies both A and B, then 2 can satisfy either only A or only B or both A and B.

on 6. August 2022, 00:33 by ViKingPrime
A thoroughly enjoyable puzzle, not too stressful for the beginner but also not too easy. That's a tough balancing act and this puzzle pulls it off beautifully.

on 6. August 2022, 00:06 by DVFrank
What does "consecutive digits must share at least one constraint" mean? As I am reading this, that would immediately imply that there is only one global constraint - but why then phrase it this way?

on 5. August 2022, 14:19 by bansalsaab
Very nice and challenging ruleset. Thanks @Scruffamudda

on 5. August 2022, 12:32 by Tilberg
Nice one! The coloring process was fun and surprising, the disambiguation part was mindbending.

Difficulty:4
Rating:94 %
Solved:45 times
Observed:6 times
ID:000APL

Variant combination Online solving tool

Enter solution

Solution code:

Login