I got to thinking about making Ant-Knight constraints a little more restrictive. But in the end, what I thought might be a new rule, was just Anti-Knight combined with Anti-King, which has been done many times before. I thought that my presentation gave people a different way of thinking (Knight's perimeter) about solving the same old problem (anti-knight plus anti-king). But, in too many cases, it was just causing confusion (especially in translation). "No need to come up with a new name for something we already have".
Click this link to play the puzzle on F-Puzzles or this link with killer cages added
Solution code: Row 5, Column 5, 18 Digits, no spaces or comma
on 17. February 2021, 18:58 by Göran H
Thank you for a very fun puzzle! I liked the ruleset, and I do like the idea to think of anti-knight and anti-king as knight's perimeter.
@ Göran H - Thanks for the feedback! Glad you enjoyed it (and its intent). I am thinking of doing a "proper" Knight's perimeter puzzle, using a Long Knight's constraint. But that will likely require some special rules, since that would cover/eliminate a lot of territory.
on 27. January 2021, 05:05 by Ryx
Changed the title and rules, to use standard terms/rules. Thanks to SKORP17, apendleton and Rollo for their input!
Titel und Regeln geändert, um Standardbegriffe/Regeln zu verwenden. Danke an SKORP17, apendleton und Rollo für ihren Beitrag!
on 26. January 2021, 15:12 by Rollo
Gefällt mir, ganz nett für zwischendurch.
on 25. January 2021, 17:11 by Ryx
Fixed typo in: Quadruple constraint (English and German)
on 25. January 2021, 16:28 by SKORP17
meine Lösung wird nicht akzeptiert, obwohl die Regeln eingehalten sind, gilt denn auch Anti-King?
@SKORP17 Ja, effektiv ist meine "neue Regel" nur Anti-Knight plus Ant-King. Das habe ich erst gemerkt, als ich mit dem Rätsel fertig war und angefangen habe zu testen.
on 25. January 2021, 10:04 by apendleton
This was fun and novel. Very complicated ruleset, though -- hard to keep everything in my head (the radius one in particular).
@apendleton Thanks for the feedback. I thought it was a novel idea, at first ;-) And I really had a hard time defining that rule, in words ... in my head it was easy. Maybe I should have called it Knight's circle or Knight's perimeter. That would have been good, like the 1 is defending his perimeter against other 1s ;-)