Partial Killer Mystery Sandwich
(Published on 17. September 2020, 16:48 by UnnamedSorcerer)
Normal Sudoku rules apply. Numbers in the upper left of cages indicate the sum of the digits contained within the cage. Digits may not repeat within cages. Clues outside the grid show the sum of the digits between the X and the Y in that row/column, where X and Y are consistent for the whole puzzle.
Here is an f-puzzles link. The sandwich clue for column 9 is >8, though it is apparently not necessary to solve the puzzle. f-puzzles link
Solution code: 3rd and 6th rows
Comments
on 18. September 2020, 01:53 by UnnamedSorcerer
Thank you Djmelee3000!
on 18. September 2020, 01:46 by Djmelee3000
Nice puzzle! Fun to find out the X and Y and not hard
on 17. September 2020, 23:51 by UnnamedSorcerer
Thank you Bropell!
on 17. September 2020, 21:26 by Bropell
@UnnamedSorcerer yeah I did that and it worked! Wonderful solve I really enjoyed this!
on 17. September 2020, 21:23 by UnnamedSorcerer
Hi Bropell, yes I think you're correct. Turning off "highlight conflicts" in the f-puzzles Settings dialog should help.
on 17. September 2020, 21:05 by Bropell
Puzzle highlights certain digits red when they are correct in column 8 for some reason. Could this have to do with the crusts differing from normal sandwich rules?
on 17. September 2020, 20:58 by Bropell
Puzzle highlights certain digits red when they are correct in column 8 for some reason. Could this have to do with the crusts differing from normal sandwich rules?
on 17. September 2020, 20:57 by Bropell
Puzzle highlights certain digits red when they are correct in column 8 for some reason. Could this have to do with the crusts differing from normal sandwich rules?
on 17. September 2020, 20:35 by UnnamedSorcerer
fixed again
on 17. September 2020, 20:34 by UnnamedSorcerer
Fixed description.
on 17. September 2020, 20:21 by fpac
didn't need >8 clue to solve. so fun though!
on 17. September 2020, 19:54 by UnnamedSorcerer
Thank you, marcmees! I did try the puzzle without that clue, but I wasn't able to solve it. I probably should have tried more than once, since I suspected that it wasn't necessary.
