Solution code: 5th and 8th row. Include both digits of 2-digit numbers.
on 21. April 2022, 12:13 by Prutsbeest
Wow, what an absolute monster this puzzle is. I had broken it a couple of times by making naive deductions but in the end I succeeded :-) very rewarding and an absolutely beautiful puzzle!
on 1. November 2021, 18:25 by dissonance
What a crazy puzzle !
I can't believe you managed to create a beast like this,congratulations.
I was confused at the start with this rule :
"If a 2-digit number appears in a cage without a number in the top left corner, its tens digit is greater than its ones digit."
I tried to understand how it
could be helpful for solving this puzzle, until I realized you probably just copied and pasted Nylimb's rules...
Great puzzle, thanks for sharing.
on 21. August 2021, 18:53 by Phistomefel
Added tag "Online solving tool".
on 15. May 2021, 09:00 by Vebby
Link to solve on Penpa Plus: https://git.io/JsZV5. Found it easier to work with 2-digit numbers on Penpa Plus versus f-puzzles due to the 'Number' mode. To activate solution check in the given link, enter 2-digits numbers in either Number mode (Normal/L/M/S) or Sudoku mode (Centre). Numbers placed using Number mode must be in Blue, Green or Red colour to activate solution check.
on 16. December 2020, 21:01 by Phistomefel
Added link to F-Puzzles
on 18. August 2020, 08:38 by ffricke
Beim ersten Versuch nur 3 Zahlen gefunden und weggelegt. Dann beim Weitermachen ging es sehr flüssig durch. Sehr schön !
on 6. April 2020, 09:08 by Nylimb
@Phistomefel: Thanks for the puzzle!
I should be careful what I wish for: This took me a few hours to solve, and I suspect that I missed some clever logic that would have reduced my solving time.
on 5. April 2020, 20:33 by marcmees
Nylimb is lucky to receive such a nice tribute puzzle.
on 5. April 2020, 19:29 by Phistomefel
Clarification of the isolation property
on 5. April 2020, 19:29 by Circleconstant314
@Phistomefel: So it's like your first isolation killer sudoku (ID: 00036E)! Now I understand, thank you!
on 5. April 2020, 19:26 by Phistomefel
@Circleconstant314: Thanks for pointing out this imprecision. What I meant was: if two cages share a common edge, they must not contain even one common digit.
on 5. April 2020, 19:21 by Circleconstant314
If a cage has more than two adjacent cages, can a digit appearing in the cage appear in more than one adjacent cage? Or is it such that the digit can still only appear in at most one adjacent cage?
Please note: The German version of this page has changed. It is possible that this page does not contain the latest information.