Ausweiden & Vierteilen: Kropki
(Published on 1. November 2014, 00:00 by Senor Dingdong)
A Kropki was executed by eliminating a row and a column and joining the remains. Solve the puzzle under the condition, that it used to be a unique Kropki.
Happy Halloween!
Fellow sufferer:
Tapa, Tents, Fences, Sudoku, Railroads
Solution code: The diagonals of the executed puzzle. First from top left to bottom right, then from top right to bottom left.
Comments
on 6. August 2024, 22:55 by DiMono
The result of splitting a dot is unclear. A concrete example: There is a black dot currently between R3C1 and R3C2. If the missing column is column 2, that would split the dot in half. Would that mean the new R3C2 would have a black dot on either side?
on 9. January 2015, 16:16 by flaemmchen
Danke, pin7guin. Dann auf ein Neues ;-))
on 9. January 2015, 16:02 by pin7guin
@flaemmchen: Ja und Ja.
on 9. January 2015, 09:16 by AnnaTh
Tolle und (für mich) knifflige Serie. Besonders das Zeltlager hat monatelang immer wieder zur Verzweiflung gebracht.
on 12. November 2014, 19:01 by CHalb
Senor Dingdong, schön dass du die Reihe fortgesetzt hast. Dieses etwas eigenartige Gefühl beim Lösen macht die Auflösung am Ende umso befriedigender.
on 6. November 2014, 21:35 by tuace
Hat mir richtig gut gefallen. Da muss ich mir doch bald die Leidensgenossen vorknöpfen. :)
on 6. November 2014, 16:17 by lupo
Schön gruselig!
on 1. November 2014, 19:56 by RALehrer
Thank you, yes it is clear now!
on 1. November 2014, 19:08 by r45
Gestern hatte ich mich noch an die schöne Serie aus dem vergangenen Jahr erinnert, und dann dieser tolle Nachschlag. :-)) Das Rätsel ist spitzenmäßig!
...uups! Die Serie liegt ja schon zwei Jahre zurück. ;-)
on 1. November 2014, 16:10 by flaemmchen
Also wenn dieser Titel nicht "ausweiden" heissen würde ...
on 1. November 2014, 12:41 by Senor Dingdong
Danke! Find ich auch:) Manche Dinge haben sich beim erstellen ganz automatisch ergeben. Andere dagegen waren komplizierter.
on 1. November 2014, 12:30 by ibag
Wieder ganz großartig!!!!!
on 1. November 2014, 09:00 by Senor Dingdong
IF a field is cancelled with a black dot on the one side and a white on the other, there would be a dot half black half white. And there COULD also exist half dots.
I hope it's clear enough now.
on 1. November 2014, 05:12 by RALehrer
Only "partly part" of the columns/rows? What does that mean? Clearly they are not all cut off, or else we'd see a row/column with no dots. Is it then that some of the dots are cancelled, while others are not, as you see fit? Or one side of the column?
on 1. November 2014, 01:42 by Senor Dingdong
Die Punkte sind zum Teil Teil der Zeilen/Spalten und werden dementsprechend entfernt.
The dots are partly part of the rows/columns and are cancelled in that way.
on 1. November 2014, 01:31 by RALehrer
What happened to the dots? Were they cut off when the row was eliminated, left on, or is either possible? If they were left on, if a black & white dot would lie on top of each other, would it show up here as black? Or is this illegal?
