Tapa-Heyawake-Liebespaar (2)
(Published on 12. November 2013, 22:01 by usp)
A Heyawake and a Tapa fell in love and have to be solved together now.
Note that the instructions have changed compared to the first "Liebespaar".Instructions
- Apply the normal rules to both the Heyawake and the Tapa.
- Copy every black field of the Heyawake directly into the corresponding field of the Tapa. Fields with circles or numbers must not be blackened.
- Write a number (greater than 0) in every segment of a circle in the Tapa. The sum of all numbers in each circle equals the number of fields (including the field itself) which are horizontally or vertically visible from the corresponding field in the Heyawake.
- The little black point in the middle of each puzzle is intended to help you orientating and has no meaning for the solution of the puzzles.
Example with solution
Puzzle
Solution code: The 2. and the 5. column of the Heyawake, read in turn from top to bottom, followed by the 2. and the 5. row of the Tapa, read in turn from left to right; type S for every black field and W for every white field.
Comments
on 20. November 2013, 11:35 by usp
Habe die Labels angepasst, danke für den Hinweis.
on 19. November 2013, 21:07 by CHalb
Klasse! Ich war angenehm überrascht, dass ich es ohne Fallunterscheidungen lösen konnte. Allerdings braucht's die Deutsch- und Englisch-Label nicht. Die sind gedacht, wenn man für's Lösen besondere Sprachkenntnisse braucht. Hier geht's aber nur darum, die Regeln zu lesen. Stattdessen würde ich die Label "Kombination aus mehreren Rätselarten" und "geteiltes Gitter" setzen.
on 19. November 2013, 15:05 by ibag
Tolles Rätsel! Mir ist das Reindenken nicht leicht gefallen. ;-)
on 14. November 2013, 21:45 by r45
Sehr schön, ich fand es gefühlt etwas leichter als den Vorgänger.
on 14. November 2013, 11:37 by adam001
Da lohnt es sich hineinzudenken!
Danke usp
on 13. November 2013, 14:24 by usp
Changed the images in the english version - sorry for confusion!
on 13. November 2013, 14:17 by rimodech
excellent puzzles!
on 13. November 2013, 14:14 by rimodech
english version has the wrong images...
on 13. November 2013, 14:07 by zorant
Example is not clearly for me. Way, number 3 on the R4C2 is not 5 when this field visible next fields R4C1,R4C2,R4C3,R3C2,R2C2
on 13. November 2013, 10:33 by saskia-daniela
Tolle Serie!
on 12. November 2013, 22:27 by usp
Aus Versehen war eine veraltete Version eingestellt, ausgetauscht gegen die endgültige und aktuelle.
