The added clues for both puzzles are written in grid 3.
Solution code: Row 1 of puzzle 1, followed by column 9 of puzzle 2.
on 9. January 2024, 01:17 by damasosos92
A two hours solve: two beautiful hours! Made some mistake along the way, but in the end I found the keys! A really wild tour, loved it!
on 27. January 2023, 09:56 by Nick Smirnov
Penpa:
https://tinyurl.com/2ea8a3ho
on 14. July 2015, 22:16 by marcmees
nice peace of logic
on 26. October 2010, 23:48 by Eisbär
This is what I call a "Tour-de-France"-puzzle... very hard, completed in about 21 stages and you're very tired afterwards :-)))
Thanks again my friend!
on 30. September 2010, 14:00 by zhergan
Amazing puzzle! Thanks Richard:)
on 10. February 2010, 12:00 by RobertBe
Every time you think you've got a breakthrough, you hit another obstacle. Never seen a puzzle before in which I had solved so much and still wasn't able to fill in the remaining numbers automatically.
on 7. February 2010, 16:47 by Realshaggy
This puzzle is like hiting a wall at full speed.
on 6. February 2010, 22:11 by ibag
Wunderschönes Rätsel! Thank you!
on 6. February 2010, 10:46 by Alex
yep, amazing how a puzzle can get more difficult the more numbers one has filled in ;)
Unfortunately in the night I had to give it a stop, as sillily had transposed one of my orange squares (designating the 3rd clues) in one of the puzzles.. sheesh!
But, this was my #500, and a good one! Thanks
on 6. February 2010, 07:08 by geibthor
Sehr schönes Rätsel, relativ harmlos im Einstieg, komplett logisch und knifflig bis zum Ende = 1:30 in der Nacht ;)
Danke!
on 5. February 2010, 17:56 by Luigi
Oh nein, 12:00 ist eine sehr schöne Zeit. Du kannst uns doch nicht so lange warten lassen! ;-)
on 5. February 2010, 16:08 by Richard
Hmmm
Maybe I should publish my puzzles at 17.00 instead of 12.00 to avoid puzzlers getting in trouble at work. :-)
on 5. February 2010, 15:57 by Statistica
Das war jetzt eine späte, lange Pause! Bin ganz begeistert, konnte es nicht weglegen! Danke!!!
on 5. February 2010, 15:13 by Le Ahcim
Nix mit L.-E. hehe... Erster!
Thats a famous thing. This riddle is wonderfully formed and is solvable without T&E. Thanks Richard.
@ Luigi: mit einem L.-E. wäre es glatte 8 Sterne wert ( brrr - ich denke da noch an "Ganz schön wild"). Bei diesem Kombi-Neuner gibt es genau einen Lösungsansatz, auf den es wohl auch aufgebaut wurde.
on 5. February 2010, 14:05 by Luigi
Oh no! found my mistake... so stupid, so stupid...
on 5. February 2010, 13:46 by Luigi
wollte eigentlich diesen "Richard" mal wieder schnell abhaken... habe mich aber hoffnungslos in Widersprüchen verrannt.... (L.- E. bei Richard ?! ... eher wohl kaum)
Also werde ich dieses mal mir dieses Leckerli ein wenig aufheben...
on 5. February 2010, 13:28 by Realshaggy
Hm, 90 minutes and not yet solved. Probably I shouldn't start that in my lunch break. Looking forward to do it this weekend!